Read the policy
Parse robots.txt with longest-match rules and evaluate every bot in our 222-entry registry.
Free · no signup · 222 bots tested
robots.txt may welcome AI crawlers while your firewall quietly turns them away. We compare policy with real server behaviour, then show exactly what to fix.
Free · no signup · 222 static checks + 19 live probes
How it works
Three bounded steps turn a public URL into an evidence-based access report.
Parse robots.txt with longest-match rules and evaluate every bot in our 222-entry registry.
Send bounded requests with 19 documented AI crawler User-Agents and a browser control.
Surface silent blocks, unenforced policies, infrastructure gaps, and an actionable AIVI score.
Dual-engine evidence
CDN bot management, WAF rules, challenges, and rate limits live below robots.txt. aibotcheck measures both layers without pretending UA emulation is IP verification.
Read the methodology →The report
AIVI is designed for decisions, not decoration. Every sub-score maps to evidence and a concrete next action.
AIVI methodology →Sample AIVI report
Practical guidance
Short playbooks connect each finding to a decision: what to allow, what to block, and how to make content machine-readable.
FAQ
Static robots.txt policy for 222 bots, live response behaviour for 19 core crawlers, plus llms.txt, structured data, markdown alternates, and selected trust signals.
No. It shows how your server treats the documented User-Agent from our network. It cannot reproduce vendor IP ranges or TLS fingerprints; every report states this limit.
robots.txt expresses intent. A WAF, CDN, or security plugin can still block a crawler that the file allows. That mismatch is a common source of accidental AI invisibility.
Yes. No account is required. Email is optional and only used when you request a report or monitoring.
Start with evidence
One URL. Two engines. A report your team can act on.