voilabot: Robots.txt & Crawl Policy Reference
Technical reference for the historical voilabot registry label, noting the shutdown of the Voila.fr search engine and the absence of current crawler documentation.
AI Summary: The registry describes
voilabotas the web crawler for the Voila search engine, historically operated by France Télécom (now Orange). However, the Voila.fr portal and search engine officially shut down in 2016. No current operator documentation, exact User-Agent, IP list, or robots policy exists. Treat the token as an obsolete historical label rather than an authenticated active crawler.
Role and policy boundary
The registry describes this entry as the Voila search engine web crawler bot and records this historical User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; U; Win64; fr; rv:1.8.1) VoilaBot BETA 1.2 (support.voilabot@orange-ftgroup.com)
Voila was a French web portal and search engine launched by France Télécom (which later rebranded as Orange). The email address in the historical User-Agent reflects this corporate ownership. However, Voila.fr officially closed its doors in 2016. The operator no longer publishes a crawler specification, explains its purpose, or documents an exact User-Agent for this label. Current crawling activities by Orange are typically documented under different identifiers (such as OrangeBot).
This profile therefore uses legacy-label and does not present the registry description as a current operator policy. A matching request is no longer an authentic Voila crawler; it could be a legacy deployment that was never decommissioned, a third-party scraper, a test client, or a spoofed header. Do not infer that an active Voila search crawler still exists, that it obeys robots.txt, or that the token establishes permission for AI input, model training, or data retention.
Because the service is discontinued, do not publish an assumed voilabot robots group as if it came from the operator. If logs establish a current, attributable token and you decide to exclude it, use the exact observed value in a deliberate site-owner rule:
User-agent: CONFIRMED-OBSERVED-VOILABOT
Disallow: /
For selective access after confirmation:
User-agent: CONFIRMED-OBSERVED-VOILABOT
Allow: /public/
Allow: /docs/
Disallow: /admin/
Disallow: /account/
Disallow: /private/
Disallow: /licensed/
Disallow: /api/
These are explanatory site-owner controls, not recovered Voila instructions. Robots.txt is advisory and cannot secure private or licensed content; use authentication, authorization, signed URLs, data minimization, and origin controls.
Layered verification
Start with raw access logs and preserve the complete User-Agent, source IP, ASN, reverse-DNS result, HTTP method, requested path, response status, response size, redirect chain, timestamp, concurrency, and request rate. Because Voila has shut down, no current source publishes an IP range, reverse-DNS procedure, Crawl-delay, rate guidance, removal address, or verification workflow.
Do not treat the orange-ftgroup.com email in a header as proof of operator ownership. A client can copy any string, and the referenced service no longer exists. Check source IP and DNS evidence independently. An IP that historically belonged to France Télécom or Orange is not proof of an authorized current crawler using this specific obsolete token.
Compare observed behavior with a search-indexing hypothesis without turning it into attribution. Public HTML, metadata, feeds, sitemaps, and ordinary assets may be requested by many tools. Private endpoints, licensed content, account routes, APIs, high concurrency, repeated retries, or unexpected bulk downloads establish impact and load risk, not Voila attribution or downstream use.
Evaluate /robots.txt only after the actual observed token is known. Confirm that it is served by the intended host, returns a successful text response, and contains the exact group you intend to publish. An absent operator source and a discontinued service are not evidence of robots compliance. If no exact group exists, a global rule may affect unrelated clients and should be adopted only as an explicit site-wide decision.
Page-level directives can express indexing preferences:
<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">
X-Robots-Tag: noindex, nofollow
These signals do not authenticate an undocumented crawler or secure private paths. Enforce sensitive boundaries in the application and at the origin. If your policy distinguishes search indexing, AI input, reference use, and model training, document each purpose separately rather than inferring permission from a discontinued registry label.
WAF and Nginx remediation examples
When the source is unverified, use report-only logging and a narrow observation. Avoid broad voila, bot, or browser rules that can affect unrelated clients:
{
"description": "Observe unverified voilabot candidates",
"expression": "lower(http.user_agent) contains \"voilabot\"",
"action": "log"
}
After independent verification and a policy decision, scope enforcement to sensitive routes and preserve evidence for the rule:
map $http_user_agent $block_confirmed_voila_private {
default 0;
# Add only a complete, independently verified token here.
# ~*VoilaBot 1;
}
server {
location ~ ^/(admin|account|private|licensed|internal|api)/ {
if ($block_confirmed_voila_private) { return 403; }
try_files $uri $uri/ =404;
}
}
A User-Agent match is easy to spoof, and the registry token points to a discontinued service. Do not invent an IP allowlist, Orange ASN exception, reverse-DNS suffix, rate, training policy, or permanent trust exception. Use per-client rate limits, concurrency ceilings, timeouts, response-size controls, caching, and anomaly detection at the edge or origin. Start in report-only mode, review false positives, and restrict only after evidence supports the action.
Test public pages, feeds, sitemaps, structured data, licensed assets, account routes, APIs, 429 behavior, response-size limits, and approved integrations separately. Pair WAF controls with authentication and application authorization instead of using robots.txt as an access-control mechanism.
Review checklist
Search logs for the exact voilabot substring and preserve the complete header, source IP, ASN, PTR result, forward lookup, path, method, response size, status, timing, rate, concurrency, and redirects. Treat the email in the header as an unverified string, not a support channel.
Re-check the crawler registry, any future Orange source, robots.txt, and operator contact path. In this review, the historical Voila.fr search engine has been closed since 2016. Keep this profile at legacy-label permanently unless the brand is verifiably resurrected by a new operator.
Decide whether your objective is to preserve public discovery, reduce crawl load, limit extraction, protect licensed material, or prevent private access. Publish exact robots rules only after the token is known; enforce private routes with authentication and origin controls.
Review search indexing, AI input, reference use, and model-training decisions separately. Neither the registry description nor a header containing an obsolete email establishes downstream permission or use. Do not claim successful blocking or verification from configuration alone; validate later logs.
Record the date and reason for the legacy-label classification so future evidence can be compared without silently upgrading an unsupported historical label. If a new deployment identifies itself differently, create a separate evidence trail.
References
- Crawler User Agents community registry — registry context for the voilabot label and User-Agent; it does not authenticate current infrastructure.
- Google Robots.txt Introduction — general explanation of crawler directives and their limitations.
- RFC 9309 — Robots Exclusion Protocol standard; it does not authenticate a User-Agent.
Need to optimize your entire site for AI search visibility? Run a comprehensive audit with Geolify.ai.